Legal Opinion

Jared Peck v. At&t Mobility

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 2011No. 09-36113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PAMELA ANN RYMER, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 16.16 of the Washington Rules of Appellate Procedure (RAP) and Revised Code of Washington § 2.60.020, we respectfully certify to the Supreme Court of Washington the question of law set forth in Section III of this order. That question will determine an issue pending before this court. No precedent in the decisions of the Supreme Court of Washington controls that issue.

I. Background

In November 2004, James Bowden purchased three cellular telephones and a monthly cellular service plan for each telephone at a Cingular kiosk in a mall. He…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. North County Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Gary Dean Broad Denise Broad, Husband and Wife v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau AgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Johnson v. Camp Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peck v. AT & T MOBILITYWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Peck v. AT&T MobilityWashington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API