Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COLINS.

We consider Harry Riddle’s (Riddle) petition for review of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of Workers’ Compensation Judge Cheryl Ig-nasiak (WCJ), granting a Petition to Modify Compensation Benefits (Modification Petition) filed by Allegheny City Electric, Inc. (Employer), and dismissing Employer’s Suspension Petition. We affirm the Board.

In August, 2000, during the course of his employment as an electrician, Riddle sustained a work-related injury originally recognized on a Notice of Temporary Compensation Payable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. South Hills Health System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Allied Products & Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. H.M. Stauffer & Sons, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riddle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Rebeor v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Riddle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API