Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 2009No. 54 WAP 2008PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*76 OPINION

Justice GREENSPAN.

Harry Riddle (Appellant) is a West Virginia resident formerly employed as an electrician by Allegheny City Electric (ACE) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In August 2000, Appellant sustained a work-related injury described as right shoulder tendonitis. ACE accepted the injury and began paying workers’ compensation benefits in the amount of $480.60 per week. The benefits were calculated based on a stipulated weekly salary of $720.86 per week.

In April 2004, ACE notified Appellant that his benefits would be terminated because he had fully recovered as of March 31, 2004.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Chanceford Aviation Properties, L.L.P. v. Chanceford Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Edwards v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Karpulk v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Worth & Co.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Bufford v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. North Pittsburgh Drywall Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API