Legal Opinion

H.M. Stauffer & Sons, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1996PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

H.M. Stauffer & Sons, Inc. (Employer) and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (collectively, Appellants) appeal an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing an order of a Workers’ *870Compensation Judge (WCJ) modifying the benefits of Eddie Davis (Claimant).

The salient facts, as found by the WCJ, are as follows. On March 12, 1991, Claimant incurred a work-related back injury while in the course of his employment with Employer. Thereafter, pursuant to a notice of compensation payable, Claimant received total disability benefits of $293.77 per week.

On April 1,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. York Terrace/Beverly Enterprises v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Farkaly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. Dauphin County Social Services for Children & YouthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Farkaly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hertzberg v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. City of Florence, Kentucky v. ChipmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Dow v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Crisman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Davis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API