Legal Opinion

Allied Products & Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 2003PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Allied Products and Services (Employer) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision denying Employer’s modification petition. The sole issue is whether substantial evidence supports the WCJ’s decision. We affirm.

In October 1999, Thomas Click (Claimant), a warehouse manager, sustained a lower back injury when he slipped and fell while loading pallets. Employer issued a notice of compensation payable acknowledging Claimant’s injury.

In February 2000, Dr. John Rychak,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Mrs. Smith's Frozen Foods Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. South Hills Health System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Burrell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Kleinhagan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Day v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Motor Coils MFG/Wabtec v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API