Legal Opinion
Livesay v. Dearmond
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1929PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This suit tests the validity and application of 1929 Session Laws, chapter 182, which is as follows:
“The county court or board of county commissioners of any county may, at its discretion waive or reduce the penalty or interest, or both, imposed for the failure to pay taxes within the time provided by law, for any year or years prior to and including 1927, if in its opinion, such action would facilitate the collection of such taxes.”
According to the complaint the plaintiff is a taxpayer in Deschutes county, who owns lands which lie both within and without the Central Oregon Irrigation…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Clark v. RossierIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Foeller v. Housing Authority of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Van Winkle v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Savage v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1938
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.