Legal Opinion
Van Winkle v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1935PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
This suit was instituted by the plaintiffs to restrain the defendants from selling ice cream at a price less than the minimum prescribed by a certain state ice cream marketing agreement, adopted under and pursuant to the provisions of chapter 37, Oregon Laws, Second Special Session, 1933, as amended by chapter 250, Oregon Laws, 1935.
The complaint alleges that, in accordance with the terms of the act, a state marketing agreement regulating the sale of ice cream and fixing 40 cents per. quart as the minimum price at which ice cream may be sold at retail in this state was duly entered into and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Foeller v. Housing Authority of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1953
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.