Judd v. Letts
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Lawler, Allen, Van Dyke & Jutten, and R. P. Jennings, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment for personal injuries. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The defendant conducted, in the city of Los Angeles, a retail store known as the “Broadway Department Store.” The business was carried on in a four-story building. Three passenger elevators were operated therein for the use of customers and employees of the defendant. On February 21, 1908, the plaintiff, who was employed by defendant in the ladies’ suit department, on the second floor of said store, had occasion, after completing her day’s work…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railroad v. MorandaIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. DriscollIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Morgan v. J. W. Robinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Swadley v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sweazey v. Valley Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. GoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- United States v. KellumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- Spier v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Patton v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.