Legal Opinion

Kano v. Arcon Corporation

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1958No. 8739PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment awarding damages resulting from an interference with plaintiffs’ irrigation facilities and water rights. Affirmed, except as hereinafter modified. Costs to defendants.

By written stipulation filed herein, the parties have settled and eliminated a number of their differences and assigned errors. The lower court is directed, therefore, to modify the judgment in accordance with the terms of said stipulation. The stipulation will accompany this decision and upon remittitur shall become a part of the official record in this case.

The stipulation is such that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tripp v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Progress Co. v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Current Creek Irrigation Co. v. AndrewsUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Current Creek Irrigation Co. v. AndrewsUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  4. N. M. Long & Co. v. Cannon-Papanikolas Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1959
  5. N. M. Long & Co. v. Cannon-Papanikolas Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API