N. M. Long & Co. v. Cannon-Papanikolas Construction Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
9 Utah 2d 307 (1959)
343 P.2d 1100
N.M. LONG & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND MAGGIE J. SMITH, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANT, R. KAY MOWER AND MRS. M.H. MOWER, PLAINTIFFS IN INTERVENTION AND APPELLANTS,
v.
CANNON-PAPANIKOLAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A PARTNERSHIP, EDWARD HOLMES, AND GRANT JENSEN, DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.
No. 8999.
Supreme Court of Utah.
September 17, 1959.
Mark, Johnson, Schoenhals & Roberts, Salt Lake City, for appellants.
Ray, Rawlins, Jones & Henderson, Salt Lake City, for respondent.
CROCKETT, Chief Justice.
The plaintiffs sued for damages and for injunctive relief based upon the claim that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895
- Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Herriman Irrigation Co. v. KeelUtah Supreme Court · 1902
- Glover v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.