Legal Opinion

N. M. Long & Co. v. Cannon-Papanikolas Construction Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1959No. 8999Published

1Opinion of the Court

9 Utah 2d 307 (1959)

343 P.2d 1100

N.M. LONG & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND MAGGIE J. SMITH, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANT, R. KAY MOWER AND MRS. M.H. MOWER, PLAINTIFFS IN INTERVENTION AND APPELLANTS,

v.

CANNON-PAPANIKOLAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A PARTNERSHIP, EDWARD HOLMES, AND GRANT JENSEN, DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.

No. 8999.

Supreme Court of Utah.

September 17, 1959.

Mark, Johnson, Schoenhals & Roberts, Salt Lake City, for appellants.

Ray, Rawlins, Jones & Henderson, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

CROCKETT, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs sued for damages and for injunctive relief based upon the claim that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Herriman Irrigation Co. v. KeelUtah Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Glover v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API