Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2010No. 20081061PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 In this case, several individuals who own property in the North Hayden Area (collectively, the "North Hayden Group" or the "Group") appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment against them. The North Hayden Group alleges that nearby Roosevelt City (the "City") has diverted water from the Neola-Whiterocks aquifer in a manner that lowers the surrounding water table and makes the soil less saturated. This diminution in soil saturation, the Group alleges, has made it more costly for Group members to irrigate their land and has impaired…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Williams v. Utah Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. CDC Restoration & Construction, LC v. Tradesmen Contractors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc. v. State Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API