Legal Opinion

City and County of Denver v. Thrailkill

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 19, 1952No. 16698PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

We will hereinafter refer to the parties as they appeared in thé trial court where defendants in error were plaintiffs and plaintiffs in error were defendants.

The individual plaintiffs earn their livelihoods as taxicab drivers who own their equipment and operate under contracts with the companies with which they are severally affiliated. These companies are the corporate plaintiffs. The method of operation carried on by the plaintiffs is called the owner-driver system and is iden tical with that which we described at length in the case of International Brotherhood v. Publix Cab Co., 119 Colo.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. City & County of Denver v. LynchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. Chenoweth v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Sapero v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. Hart v. Board of Examiners of EmbalmersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. FrancisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  2. Board of County Com'rs of Pitkin County v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. City and County of Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. State v. NussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Regency Services Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API