Legal Opinion

City & County of Denver v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 29, 1932No. 13,149PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAINTIFFS in error are hereinafter referred to as the city, defendant in error Lynch as plaintiff, and defendant in error Luxford as the county judge.

This suit is prosecuted under our Declaratory Judgments Act and its purpose is to secure a judicial determination of the constitutionality of Colorado's "Old Age Pension" law and an interpretation thereof. It was brought by plaintiff against all the plaintiffs in error and the county judge. The latter, by his answer, took substantially the same position as plaintiff, admitted the constitutionality of the statute and alleged that he had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Schneider v. CunninghamMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Greenwood Cemetery Land Co. v. RouttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Gabriel v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Corbett v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Sing Tuck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. California Products, Inc. v. Puretex Lemon Juice, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Smith v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. Town of Tryon v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API