Legal Opinion

Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. Francis

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 27, 1956No. 17666PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

This is a suit for an injunction and for damages brought by plaintiff in error, herein referred to as plaintiff, or by name, against defendant in error, referred to by name, or as defendant. The action is predicated on the Colorado Fair Trade Act, C.R.S. ’53, 55-1-4. A temporary injunction was denied,, and plaintiff’s action was, on motion of counsel for defendant, dismissed. Plaintiff is here on writ of error,..

■ The question presented is whether the “non-signer” clause of the Fair Trade Act is constitutional.

The complaint recites that plaintiff manufactures and sells firearms and ammunition…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bulova Watch Co. v. Brand Distributors of North Wilkesboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Colorado Auto & Truck Wreckers Ass'n v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Corning Glass Works v. Ann & Hope, Inc. of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API