City and County of Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
This cause is here on writ of error to review a judgment of the district court of the City and County of Denver entered in an action there filed to test the validity of certain portions of the zoning ordinance of the city. : ■
Plaintiffs in error were defendants, and the Denver Buick, Inc., Mollie Cohan, Lou Cohan, and Saleo Corporation were plaintiffs, in the trial court. Rainbo Bread Company, Weaver-Beatty Motor Company and Roy J. Weaver were permitted to intervene as additional parties plaintiff. In this opinion we will refer to defendants in error as plaintiffs or interveners or by their…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Colby v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- City of Golden v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Service Oil Co. v. RhodusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- State v. RushSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- McMillin v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.