Legal Opinion
Regency Services Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 12, 1991No. 91SA125PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn
The question in this case is whether the Colorado Massage Parlor Code, §§ 12-48.5-101 to -119, 5B C.R.S. (1991), and Adams County Ordinance No. 2, entitled Ordinance Establishing Massage Parlor Regulations, both of which regulate commercially operated massage parlors but exempt certain types of massage procedures from governmental control, are unconstitutionally vague in violation of due process of law, violate equal protection of the laws, or suffer from unconstitutional overbreadth. The district court denied the request of Regency Services Corporation (Regency) for declaratory and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. JanousekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Watso v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. GrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Ferguson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- City of Colorado Springs v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.