Legal Opinion

Konnerup v. Frandsen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1894No. 1191PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Superior Cou/rt, Ki/ng County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J. — The appellant contracted, March 14, 1890, to clear certain lands belonging to defendants, and *552to receive in payment certain other lands described in the complaint. The agreement was reduced to writing, and signed by J. C. Frandsen, the husband of the co-defendant, Elizabeth Frandsen. It is conceded that the tract of land which is asked to be conveyed is community property. The prayer is for specific performance of the contract, and for damages in case the contract for any reason cannot be enforced. A demurrer was interposed to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morgan v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nichols Hills Bank v. McCoolWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Whiting v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Hay v. Chehalis Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In Re Horse Heaven Irr. Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API