Legal Opinion

Hay v. Chehalis Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1933No. 24336. Department TwoPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

It is sought by this action to have the title to certain real estate and the title'to the timber thereon unified and quieted in the plaintiffs. Trial before the court, without a jury, resulted in a judgment wholly adverse to plaintiffs. From the judgment, the plaintiffs have appealed.

On and prior to May 18, 1907, J. A. Veness and Augusta Veness, his wife, as a community, owned two tracts of land, each comprising’ forty acres, in Lewis county, Washington. On that day, Mr. Yeness entered into a contract with B. A. Bartholomew and Walter Flanigan, predecessors in interest of the appellants, for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Skamania Boom Co. v. YoumansWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. France v. Deep River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Konnerup v. FrandsenWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Nelson v. McKinneyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. O'Connor v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Whiting v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In Re Horse Heaven Irr. Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Campbell v. WebberWashington Supreme Court · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API