Legal Opinion
Endrezze v. Dorr Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1938No. 8736PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The appellant sued in the Southern District of California for infringement of letters patent. Appellee appeared specially and moved to quash the writ, service of which had been obtained on one of its employees at Los Angeles. The motion was made on the asserted grounds that appellee, a Delaware corporation, has no regular and established place of business within the Southern District of California and had committed no act of infringement there. The court quashed the writ and dismissed the bill.
The facts are not substantially in dispute. In support of the motion,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Stanley Electric Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Frink Co. v. EriksonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Wilson v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- General Radio Company v. Superior Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Watsco, Inc. v. Henry Valve CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Brevel Products Corp. v. H & B AMERICAN CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.