International Harvester Co. of America v. Kentucky
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR -TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF ' KENTUCKY. The facts, which involve the sufficiency of service of process upon a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Kentucky and also the constitutionality of the anti-trust act of Kentucky, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
A penal action was instituted by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error in the Boyle Circuit Court of Kentucky under the anti-trust laws of that State. Summons having been served upon an alleged agent of the plaintiff in error, it filed a motion to quash the return for the reason, as alleged, that the person upon whom service had been made was not the authorized agent of the plaintiff in error and that it was not doing business in Kentucky. The facts in this case which are identical with those set out in the previous case, International Harvester Company of America v. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Miedreich v. LauensteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3Cited by14 opinions
- Draper v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Davidson v. Henry L. Doherty & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Endrezze v. Dorr Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Busch v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Sadler v. Pennsylvania Refining Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.