Legal Opinion

Chance v. Arcularius

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1951No. 3637PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

Appellants, plaintiffs below, appealed from an adverse judgment and from the order denying their motion for *53a new trial. Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal from the order denying new trial upon the ground that such appeal is ineffectual for lack of an undertaking on such appeal.

Appellants’ notice of appeal to this court recited that they appealed “from the judgment [describing it] and from an order denying a motion for a new trial [describing it].” On the same day they served and filed their undertaking on appeal reciting:…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Magee v. WhitacreNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Jasper v. JewkesNevada Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Little v. ThatcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Spokane Cattle Loan Co. v. Crane Creek Sheep Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Twilegar v. StevensNevada Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chance v. ArculariusNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Mikulich v. CarnerNevada Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API