Legal Opinion

Fox v. Burton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 11, 1966No. 51506PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Commissioner.

In this action for broker’s commission plaintiffs had verdict and judgment for $51,632 against defendant John G. Burton, and he seeks to be relieved from that judgment on this appeal. There is also a “conditional” appeal by plaintiff Gerald L. Fox from a judgment in favor of defendant David A. Blanton, Jr., on Fox’s alternative count against Blanton for $73,200 for reasonable value of services.

Count I of the petition alleges: Plaintiffs are engaged in the brokerage business in St. Louis, Missouri, and plaintiff Gerald L. Fox is associated with the firm of Smith-Moore &…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burger v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. LaForce v. Washington UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Goffe v. GibsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Duncan v. BlackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Axsom v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Rolland and Loretta WINDLE and R & L Farms, Inc., Debtors. AGRISTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, Appellee, v. Rolland and Loretta WINDLE, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Rietsch v. TWH Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Campbell v. DixonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Wages v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Holt v. JamiesonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API