Duncan v. Black
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUARK, Judge.
This is a suit on a note, but the tentacles of the question reach into the mysteries of cotton acreage allotments. The plaintiff, now appellant, sued the defendants-respondents on a $1,500 note. The note was pleaded in conventional form. The answer was admission of execution but denial of consideration. At trial, which was without jury, the plaintiff offered his note and rested. The defendants, as was their burden, since the note imports a valid consideration, 1 then went forward with the evidence, and on the uncontradicted evidence the following facts were established.
Defendant…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pitts v. GarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Gilbert v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Weisert v. BrammanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Morris v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Lugena v. HannaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- In Re Rolland and Loretta WINDLE and R & L Farms, Inc., Debtors. AGRISTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, Appellee, v. Rolland and Loretta WINDLE, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Dickey v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Eberting v. SkinnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.