Legal Opinion

Burger v. City of Springfield

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 13, 1959No. 47020PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DALTON, Judge.

This is an action by which plaintiff seeks to recover $100,000 for personal services rendered the City of Springfield as a negotiator in the purchase of the property of the Springfield City Water Company, a public utility. The amended petition contains two counts in which different theories of recovery are set forth, as hereinafter stated. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss both counts and plaintiff appealed.

The facts alleged as a basis for the plaintiff’s claim are substantially as follows: On June 25, 1956, the City Council of the City of Springfield, Missouri, duly…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Aurora Water Co. v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Huttig v. BrennanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Kansas City v. RathfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. Bride v. City of SlaterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Ferris v. JenningsUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Newsome v. Kansas City, Missouri School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. Laclede Gas Company, Doing Business as Midwest Missouri Gas Company v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Lynch v. Webb City School District No. 92Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Needles v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API