Legal Opinion

Holt v. Jamieson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1993No. 61417PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, James Jamieson, Jr. (defendant), appeals from the order of the trial court granting plaintiff, Matthew Holt (plaintiff), a new trial without specification of the grounds. The trial court had previously granted defendant’s motion for directed verdict. We affirm in part and remand accordingly and reverse in part.

The issue raised in this appeal is whether an oral agreement between the parties was supported by consideration thereby creating a contract.

The evidence viewed in a light most favorable to plaintiff discloses that an agreement between plaintiff and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Blue Cross Health Services, Inc. v. SauerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Maples v. Charles Burt Realtor, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Elmore v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Fox v. BurtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Drury v. Missouri Youth Soccer Ass'n, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Vulgamott v. PerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Arkansas-Missouri Forest Products, LLC v. Stuart J. Lerner, Defendants/Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Cass Bank & Trust Co. v. MestmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Budget Rent a Car of St. Louis v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API