Legal Opinion
Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et Al
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 27, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-1564PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
In June 2010, the Child and Family Services Agency of the District of Columbia conducted a reduction in force. The plaintiffs were among those who lost their jobs. They allege that they were laid off because of their age and race. The defendants have moved to dismiss the case or, in the alternative, for summary judgment prior to discovery.
I. BACKGROUND
In their complaint, the plaintiffs allege that they were employed by the District of Columbia’s Child and Family Services Agency (“CFSA” or “the agency”) until June 11, 2010, when a reduction…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davis v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et AlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Art and Drama Therapy Institute, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Bradshaw v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Breiterman v. U.S. Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.