Legal Opinion
Breiterman v. U.S. Capitol Police
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 16, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2016-0893Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JODI BREITERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-0893 (TJK/RMM) ) UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Jodi Breiterman’s Motion to Compel [ECF No. 27], which seeks to compel the United States Capitol Police (“Defendant” or “USCP”) to produce records responsive to Plaintiff’s Request for Production 23, respond to Interrogatories 12 and 14,1 and provide a witness to testify on Topic 15 of her Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice. The District Judge previously…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Holbrook, Dawnele v. Reno, JanetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Greg Burley v. National Passenger Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Cathy S. NEUREN, Appellant, v. ADDUCI, MASTRIANI, MEEKS & SCHILL, Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.