Legal Opinion

State v. Castillo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 4, 2021No. A170025PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

699 Submitted October 19, 2020; supplemental judgment requiring defendant to pay $240.50 in restitution reversed, otherwise affirmed August 4, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JACK CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 17CR78881; A170025 (Control), A170026

495 P3d 191

Defendant injured the victim in this case, T, by pushing her to the ground. T sought medical treatment for her injuries, which cost just under $250. As a result of defendant’s conduct, defendant was charged with, and convicted of, two counts of harassment, ORS 166.065. At sentencing, neither…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. McClellandCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  4. Evans v. FinleyOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. State v. SnodgrassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. SnodgrassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API