Legal Opinion

State v. Wagoner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 24, 2013No. C091915CR; A145834PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to identity theft, ORS 165.800. Although the victim provided her restitution information in a timely fashion to the district attorney’s office, the victim’s advocate who received it failed to forward the information to the prosecutor. As a result, the prosecutor told the court that the victim had not provided restitution information, and the court awarded no restitution. After learning of the mistake, the victim filed a motion asserting her constitutional right to restitution. The trial court ruled in the victim’s favor and imposed restitution on defendant. On appeal,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. RiekerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API