State v. Orcutt
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.
In January 2013, defendant received a downward departure sentence of probation as a result of her conviction for two counts of identity theft, ORS 165.800.1 At that time, the statutory presumptive sentence for each of those convictions for a person with defendant’s criminal history was 34 months in prison. ORS 137.717(1) (2012), amended by Or Laws 2013, ch 649, § 5. Shortly after the judgment of conviction, ORS 137.717(1) was amended to decrease the presumptive sentence for identity theft. Or Laws 2013, ch 649, § 5. The amendment to ORS 137.717(1) applies to “sentences imposed on or after…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. NessOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- In re FosterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SilsbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. BustamanteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. KeyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. PoborCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.