Legal Opinion

State v. Orcutt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 31, 2016No. 12CR0604, 12CR0667; A155435 (Control), A155436PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

In January 2013, defendant received a downward departure sentence of probation as a result of her conviction for two counts of identity theft, ORS 165.800.1 At that time, the statutory presumptive sentence for each of those convictions for a person with defendant’s criminal history was 34 months in prison. ORS 137.717(1) (2012), amended by Or Laws 2013, ch 649, § 5. Shortly after the judgment of conviction, ORS 137.717(1) was amended to decrease the presumptive sentence for identity theft. Or Laws 2013, ch 649, § 5. The amendment to ORS 137.717(1) applies to “sentences imposed on or after…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. NessOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In re FosterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SilsbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. BustamanteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. KeyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. PoborCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API