State v. Barrett
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.
Appellant is the victim of the crime of stalking, a Class A misdemeanor. ORS 163.732(2)(a). The trial court concluded that, in the criminal proceeding against defendant, the perpetrator of the crime, the state violated the victim’s rights as a crime victim under the Oregon Constitution. However, the trial court held that neither the Oregon Constitution nor the Oregon statutes provided a remedy for the violation. Pursuant to ORS 147.537, the victim filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying the victim a remedy. We reverse and remand.
We begin with a brief discussion of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Burt v. BlumenauerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. AlgeoOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Vasquez v. Double Press Mfg., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. Cazares-Mendez/Reyes-SanchezOregon Supreme Court · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.