Legal Opinion

State v. Barrett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2011No. CC D110426M; SC S059423PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

Appellant is the victim of the crime of stalking, a Class A misdemeanor. ORS 163.732(2)(a). The trial court concluded that, in the criminal proceeding against defendant, the perpetrator of the crime, the state violated the victim’s rights as a crime victim under the Oregon Constitution. However, the trial court held that neither the Oregon Constitution nor the Oregon statutes provided a remedy for the violation. Pursuant to ORS 147.537, the victim filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying the victim a remedy. We reverse and remand.

We begin with a brief discussion of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Burt v. BlumenauerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. AlgeoOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Vasquez v. Double Press Mfg., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. Cazares-Mendez/Reyes-SanchezOregon Supreme Court · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API