Legal Opinion

California Country Club Homes Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1993No. B072203PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

In this case we are asked to interpret recent amendments to the Subdivision Map Act. (Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.) In 1985 the Legislature amended section 66452.6, subdivision (a) to grant automatic 36-month extensions to file final maps provided a developer, who is required as a condition of approval of a tentative map to spend large sums of money on off site improvements, files a phased final map before the tentative map would otherwise expire. That amendment also provided mandatory extensions could not extend the life of a tentative map beyond 10 years from its initial…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Ortland v. County of TehamaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1996
  3. Barker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Aetna Health Plans of California, Inc. v. Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. FigueroaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API