Legal Opinion

Ortland v. County of Tehama

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 12, 1996No. CIV S-95-287 LKKPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.

This matter is before me upon further briefing ordered by the court after ruling on a portion of defendant’s motion to dismiss. Based on the pleadings and papers on file, the court disposes of the matters remaining herein. See Local Rule 230(h).

I

PLEADINGS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff, Leo Francis Ortland, filed this civil rights complaint against the County of Tehama (the “County”) and John Charles Williams. His second amended complaint asserts claims against the County for, inter alia, negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and violation…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
  5. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Telnikoff v. MatusevitchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Gong v. City of RosemeadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Wilson v. Haria and Gogri Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2007
  4. Brewster v. County of ShastaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2000
  5. Cabardo v. PatacsilDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API