Legal Opinion

People v. Figueroa

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1999No. D031565PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

This case was certified to this court by the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of San Diego County pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 63. Danny Figueroa’s appeal raises a single issue: Does the failure of law enforcement officers to comply with the regulatory guidelines for the use of underage decoys established by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (Department) constitute a defense to Business and Professions Code 1 section 25658 criminal prosecutions in light of the statement in California Code of Regulations, title 4, division 1, article 22,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gilgert v. Stockton Port DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Y.M. (In re Maria Q.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Amdahl Corp. v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Aetna Health Plans of California, Inc. v. Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. People v. ValenciaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API