Legal Opinion

Shoen v. Zacarias

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided April 4, 2019No. B284374PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.

*1114When a landowner grants someone permission to use her land, she generally retains the right to revoke that license at any time. ( Emerson v. Bergin (1888) 76 Cal. 197, 201, 18 P. 264.) The landowner may nevertheless be estopped from revoking that license-and the license will accordingly become irrevocable for "so long a time as the nature of it calls for"-if the person using the land has "expended money[ ] or its equivalent in labor" improving the land "in the execution of the license." ( Cooke v. Ramponi (1952) 38 Cal.2d 282, 286, 239 P.2d 638 ( Cooke ); Stoner v. Zucker (1906) 148 Cal. 516,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Oregel v. AMERICAN ISUZU MOTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gamerberg v. 3000 E. 11th Street, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Medipro Medical Staffing v. Certified Nursing RegistryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Servin v. Rios CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API