Legal Opinion
Planning & Conservation League v. Castaic Lake Water Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 2009No. B200673PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANELLA, J.
Planning and Conservation League (PCL) and California Water Impact Network (CWIN) sought administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) in actions involving Castaic Lake Water Agency (Castaic). Their petitions challenged an environmental impact report (EIR) certified by Castaic pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) concerning a transfer of water from Kern County Water Agency (Kern) and Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa Water Storage District (Wheeler Ridge) to Castaic. Although the trial court rejected PCL’s and CWIN’s…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Association of Irritated Residents v. Department of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Citizens for Open Government v. City of LodiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Silverado Modjeska Recreation & Park District v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Merritt v. DitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.