In Re Appeal of Richards
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. This is the second appeal in litigation between neighbors Stuart Richards and Paul Nowicki concerning Nowicki’s desire to build a house on 84 Elm Street in the Town of Norwich. In this appeal, Richards claims the environmental court erred by con- eluding that 84 Elm Street and an adjoining parcel Nowicki owns are two separate lots for zoning purposes because a right-of-way providing access to Richards’s property divides them. We reverse.
¶ 2. In 1996, Nowicki bought 84 Elm Street and an adjoining parcel, 76 Elm Street, from an individual who had held title to both parcels since 1967.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Wilcox v. Village of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Drumheller v. Shelburne Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Catamount Slate Products, Inc. v. SheldonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- In Re Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Miller Subdivision Final PlanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re Appeal of Jenness & BerrieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- 204 North Avenue NOV - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court · 2018
- Appeal of Jenness & BerrieVermont Superior Court · 2006
- Appeal of Jenness and BerrieVermont Superior Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.