Legal Opinion
In Re Edwin P. Pleuddemann
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 3, 1990No. 89-1510PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the. March 3, 1989, decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (board) affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 8-16, 18-21, 26, and 27 of Pleuddemann’s application serial No. 917,950, a division of serial No. 803,043, filed November 29, 1985, for “Silane Coupling Agents.” The real party-in interest is Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, Michigan. We reverse.
The rejection of the above claims is predicated solely on 35 U.S.C. § 103 on the ground of obviousness in view of the disclosure of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In Re John A. Durden, Jr., and Arthur P. Kurtz, JrCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Application of Gunther Wilke and Werner PfohlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Winifred June Adams, David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Faizulla G. KathawalaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- In Re Michihiko Ochiai, Taiiti Okada, Osami Aki, Akira Morimoto, Kenji Kawakita, and Yoshihiro MatsushitaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Northlake Marketing & Supply, Inc. v. Glaverbel, S.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997