Legal Opinion
In Re John A. Durden, Jr., and Arthur P. Kurtz, Jr
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 10, 1985No. Appeal 85-601PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the examiner’s rejection of the single claim remaining in application serial No. 148,557, filed May 9, 1980, for a process of making certain compounds 1 as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of a U.S. patent to Punja, No. 3,843,669. We affirm.
Background
Quoting appellants’ brief, they filed a parent application June 21, 1976, “claiming novel oxime compounds, novel insecticidal carbamate compounds and a novel process for producing the carbamate compounds,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Application of Gunther Wilke and Werner PfohlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Winifred June Adams, David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Moleculon Research Corporation v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- In Re KubinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- In Re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill and James G. LarsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.