Legal Opinion
Application of Gunther Wilke and Werner Pfohl
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 13, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6854PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
The Patent Office Board of Appeals affirmed the examiner’s rejection of twelve claims, numbered 18 through 27, inclusive, 36 and 37, 1 of appellants’ patent application 2 entitled “Carboxylic Acid Anhydrides, Carboxylic Acids and Carboxylic Acid Esters of the Cyclododecane Series, and A Process For Their Production.”
Of the remaining claims on appeal, the invention is claimed in claims numbered 18 through 27, inclusive, in terms of a process for producing novel reaction products from maleic acid anhydride and the specified cyclohydrocarbon. Claim 18, considered illustrative by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of BremnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In Re John A. Durden, Jr., and Arthur P. Kurtz, JrCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Arthur W. Chester, Albert B. Schwartz and William A. Stover v. Stephen J. Miller and Keith C. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Application of Michael Mojzesz SzwarcCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.