Legal Opinion

Steere v. Vanderberg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Montcalm. (Smith, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

In this case the writ of replevin issued by the plaintiffs was quashed, and the cause came on to be heard in the court below for the purpose of assessing the value of the property taken upon the writ. Testimony was *531taken therein, and upon request of plaintiffs the circuit court filed special findings of fact and law as follows:

“1. In September, 1884, one George C. W. Richards was engaged in the drug business at Sheridan, Michigan, and had in his possession, and owned the same, a stock of drugs and medicines.
“ 2. September o, 1884, Hazeltine, Perkins & Co., in the names of the different…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Millar v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Thompson v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Granger v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Peninsular Savings Bank v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Goodspeed v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Coe v. HinkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Nugent v. NugentMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Barnes v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API