Legal Opinion

Goodspeed v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1910No. Docket No. 161PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Attachment proceedings by Charles A. Goodspeed against James W. Smith. An order dismissing the writ for want of jurisdiction is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff seized defendant’s goods upon a circuit court attachment, issued May 31, 1909, re*689turnable June 30, 1909. The writ was returned July 2, 1909, showing levy on property. No personal service was made, as defendant could not be found in the county. Publication began July 8th, and continued to and including August 19, 1909. August 26, 1909, affidavit of publication was filed. September 2,1909, declaration was filed. November 6, 1909, affidavit of nonappearance was filed and default entered. Defendant thereupon appeared for the purpose of moving to dismiss the case for want of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peninsular Savings Bank v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Steere v. VanderbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Schoenfeld v. BourneMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Woolkins v. HaidMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Kurtz v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Guastello v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Smak v. GwozdikMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Del Prado Motel, Inc. v. Charles J. Rogers, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Granader v. Public BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1967
  5. State Mutual Rodded Fire Ins. v. EngelMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API