Legal Opinion

Nugent v. Nugent

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Bill in aid of execution. The facts are stated in the opinion, as far as material to the decision of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The facts in this case are very well stated by ■counsel for defendant, and are as follows:

“The bill of complaint in this case is filed by James Nugent as judgment creditor of Daniel Nugent, one of the ■defendants, to set aside a deed of lands made by Daniel to Emanuel, upon the alleged ground that said conveyance is fraudulent and void as to the creditors of the said Daniel.
“ As we understand it, the case turns upon questions of law, and nearly all of the more material facts are either conceded or established by clear admissions of the party against whom they weigh.
“ Outlined briefly, they…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Millar v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Thompson v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Steere v. VanderbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Woolkins v. HaidMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Rolfe v. DudleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peninsular Savings Bank v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Eames v. ManleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Comstock v. HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Barnes v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Kurtz v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API