Coe v. Hinkley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Assumpsit bj- Henry H. Coe and Frederick Wilkes against Myron Hinkley upon an assignment of an account for the purchase price of corporate stock. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Hinkley and Sinclair were stockholders in the Alanson Manufacturing Company. They made a written contract, dated October 30, 1893, whereby Sinclair agreed to sell and Hinkley to buy 243 shares of stock in said company for the sum of $2,400, payment to be made in installments, to be guaranteed in writing upon the contract by the Alanson Manufacturing Company, which guaranty was duly indorsed of the same date. The amount remaining unpaid and in controversy is $725, less two small orders, given by Sinclair upon the Alanson Manufacturing Company and paid by it, ■amounting to $78. On April 11,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barber v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Emerson v. Detroit Steel & Spring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Iron Cliffs Co. v. LahaisMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Steere v. VanderbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Seligman v. Estate of Ten EyckMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bay County Bar Ass'n v. Finance System, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Northern Indiana Railway Co. v. Lincoln National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
- Van Slyke v. RooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Blackford v. Westchester Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Hicks v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.