Legal Opinion

Handley v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1930No. Docket No. 6919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An action to recover for injuries to plaintiff’s automobile caused by defendant’s negligence.

A trial by jury having been waived, the cause was tried by the court.

Damages were allowed by the court for the alleged cost of towing the automobile to a repair-shop and the cost of repairs, a total of $512.05.

Defendant has appealed from the judgment which was entered against him for the above amount. He contends .that the finding as to the first item is unsupported; further, that the plaintiff was insured against loss, and that the cost of repairing the car was paid by the insurance company…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Kast v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Grosse-Becker v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nygard v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Fleschler v. StraussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Vadner v. RozzelleUtah Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API