Legal Opinion

Nygard v. Dickinson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1938No. 8640PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

The appellees, as plaintiffs, brought suit against the appellants, praying that they be decreed the owners of an undivided one-third interest in certain mining claims situated in Alaska; that they be decreed entitled to an undivided one-third interest in the sum of $30,000 agreed to be paid by defendant Evis Corporation to defendants Nygard and Nuckolls, in payment of the purchase price of said mining claims.

At the trial the following facts were brought out:

In 1904 Gunder Nygard located a mining claim which he named the “Goo Goo”, near Sea Level, Thorne Arm, in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
  3. Manuel v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Mining Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Black v. Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Worcester Felt Pad Corporation v. Tucson Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. Universal Gas Co. v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  4. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corporation v. FearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. United States v. MobleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API