Legal Opinion

Vadner v. Rozzelle

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1935No. 5518PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Justice.

Plaintiff, as assignee of four choses in action, brought this action to recover for damages by fire alleged to have been negligently caused by defendant. Plaintiff’s assignors are three insurance companies who paid the. fire loss and took subrogation agreements or assignments which were by the companies’ adjusters assigned to plaintiff, and one alleged owner of property who assigned directly to plaintiff. All the losses occurred in the same fire. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. From a judgment for plaintiff on all causes of action the defendants appeal. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kast v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McLawson v. Paragon Repining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Jones v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Palacine Oil Co. v. PhilpotSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Concordia Fire Insurance v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. PercivalUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ogden Livestock Shows, Inc. v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Jenkins v. PercivalUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Vadner v. RozzelleUtah Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API