Legal Opinion

Brown v. Hagadorn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1912No. Nos. 17,777—(104)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application to the district court for Crow Wing county to register title to certain land. The facts are stated in the opinion. From an order, McClenahan, J., discharging the order to show canse and denying the application of William H. McGrath, James E. McGrath and Eobert W. McGarry, for leave to answer and defend in that proceeding, and from the rulings, decisions and orders adverse to them, they appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

Appeal by William H. McGrath, James E. McGrath and Eobert W. McGarry from an order of the district court for Crow Wing-county, denying their application for leave to answer in the matter of the application of Thomas H. Brown to have registered the title to certain lands therein, under the provisions of E. L. 1905, c. 65.

The motion was presented solely upon affidavits and documentary evidence, from which it appears, without controversy, that the applicant was on March 10, 1911, the record owner of the lands in question, and on that day fthed an application for the registration thereof. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Owsley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. McClymond v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lamprey v. American Hoist & Derrick Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. McDaniel v. FingerhutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. In Re Application of McDaniel to Register TitleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Application of MorlockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Nitkey v. S. T. McKnight Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API