Legal Opinion

Peters v. City of Duluth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 26, 1912No. Nos. 17,639—(202)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Application, by the sole surviving trustee under the last will of John L. Dodge, deceased, to the district court for St. Louis county, to register title to land under the Torrens law. Louis Polinslcy, one of the defendants brought into the proceedings in accordance with the report of the examiner, fthed his answer, and demanded a trial by jury. He also moved that the proceeding be dismissed upon the grounds enumerated in the first paragraph of the opinion.

Read the full summary

Application, by the sole surviving trustee under the last will of John L. Dodge, deceased, to the district court for St. Louis county, to register title to land under the Torrens law. Louis Polinslcy, one of the defendants brought into the proceedings in accordance with the report of the examiner, fthed his answer, and demanded a trial by jury. He also moved that the proceeding be dismissed upon the grounds enumerated in the first paragraph of the opinion. From an order, Dancer, J., denying the motions, defendant Polinsky appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

Application to register title under the Torrens law. The application showed and the examiner found title in the applicant proper for registration, and also that the land was unoccupied, except that the appellant, Louis Polinsky, and several others, were using the same for pasture purposes, as licensees at will, under an oral license from the applicant. The examiner further found that the said Polinsky .had erected a small barn upon part of the premises, and recommended that the said persons should be made parties to the proceeding, and that the applicant be granted the relief prayed. The said…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Judges of Court of RegistrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Allen v. Pioneer-Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. State v. GuilbertOhio Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Robinson v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. State ex rel. Wilcox v. RyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. SodergrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Hawley v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API