Owsley v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants Michael Gallagher and others from a judgment and .decree of the district court for St. Louis, county, Cant, J., entered upon the application of plaintiffs in proceedings for the registration of the title to land under the Torrens system.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Proceedings under the Torrens system of land transfer to register title to certain land in the city of Duluth. The. facts are as follows: Minnesota Point, a peninsula of land extending into Lake Superior, was surveyed by the general government into fractional lots, and properly designated as such on the records in the General Land Office. Subsequently all the land composing the peninsula and so surveyed was entered at the proper United States land office as a town site, under the provisions of the act of Congress’of May 23, 1844, c. 17, 5 St. 657, by certain persons composing the “town…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re RobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Lamm v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Rich v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Wait v. MaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Taylor v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by14 opinions
- Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Anderson v. BirkelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Peters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Seeger v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Brown v. HagadornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.